Current location:travel >>
Hong Kong's Messi mess: A distraction from more important things
travel155People have gathered around
IntroductionA rare moment of public preoccupation has hit Hong Kong as a result of the incident which would in d ...
A rare moment of public preoccupation has hit Hong Kong as a result of the incident which would in due course probably be called Messigate by the popular tabloids, if we had any left.
The hero of this debacle is Lionel Messi, a footballer of sublime gifts who is now getting a bit long in the tooth. As footballers sometimes do at this stage of their careers, he has moved from the highly competitive European scene to the US of A, where the football is worse but the money is better. Not so much a swan song as a goose with golden eggs song.
So, Messi now twinkles his agile toes for a new club called Inter Miami. The name is a straight lift from a legendary Italian club, Inter Milan. Inter Miami is not yet legendary.
Many of the spectators were extremely offended, and a speech at the end of the match from David Beckham, who used to be a footballer but nowadays is famous for being famous, was booed.
Subscribe to HKFP's twice-weekly newsletter for a concise round-up of local news and our best coverage. Unsubscribe at any time - we will not pass on your data to third parties.
Processing… Success! You're on the list. Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.Cue outrage on all channels that fans had been scammed. The internet frothed with bitter complaints. Some irate fans resorted to the Consumer Council. Column inches were devoted to Messi’s medical symptoms and history. Academics were interviewed. Chinese-state media suggested that it was a result of “external forces” seeking to embarrass the city.
After the organising magazine announced that – given the circumstances – it would not collect the government subsidy, our leaders could wade in. Secure, for a change, from charges that they had misplanned an event or wasted taxpayers’ money, they were free to express warm solidarity with disgruntled fans and call for money to be returned to them.
Which is all very well, and has provided a great deal of harmless media fodder. It has also, rather regrettably, consumed a large chunk of the rather small period allowed for people to comment on the upcoming national security legislation.
This is a pity. I was surprised by a recent offering in China Daily’s English version from Lau Siu-kai. Lau is an emeritus professor of sociology – a polite academic way of saying retired – and a consultant to the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macau Studies, a think tank where democratic ideas are drowned.
Those of us who were here at the time will remember as the high point of Lau’s career his prediction in 2003 that the July 1 march against the government’s first attempt to pass such legislation would only attract 30,000 or so people – a forecast which turned out to be about 500,000 people light.
However, if you want to know what the government is plotting then Lau is your man, so I waded through his thoughts on “colour revolutions.” This involved a very elaborate string of definitions, understandable in a way because Lau could hardly be expected to use the common-sense definition, which would be something like “a popular movement aiming at the overthrow of a despotic regime.” For Lau a colour revolution is a Bad Thing.
He then proceeded to explain how the national security law would prevent colour revolutions in Hong Kong. Which included some interesting observations. For example:
It will no longer be possible for political groups to freely participate in the leadership, planning, organization and mobilization of a “color revolution”. The Ordinance will stipulate: “If the Secretary for Security reasonably believes that prohibiting the operation or continued operation of any local organization in the HKSAR is necessary for safeguarding national security, the Secretary for Security may by order published in the Gazette prohibit the operation or continued operation of the organization in the HKSAR,” and “If a local organization is a political body and has a connection with an external political organization, the Security for Security may by order published in the Gazette prohibit the operation or continued operation of the local organization in the HKSAR.
This seems a little stark. No obligation to tell society first, or give it a chance to explain itself; no avenue for appeal? It also seems a bit unnecessary. In 2018 the police withdrew registration as a society from the Hong Kong National Party on national security grounds. We are plugging a non-existent loophole.
Then there is this:
It will be difficult for hostile forces to spread false information to slander the central government and the HKSAR government, to instigate hatred, division and opposition in society, and to instigate, lead and organize unrest. That is because they would be committing the offense of espionage under the Ordinance, which includes “colluding with an external force to publish a statement of fact that is false or misleading to the public, and the person, with intent to endanger national security or being reckless as to whether national security would be endangered, so publishes the statement; and knows that the statement is false or misleading.
I quite see why one might wish to have a law against false statements, although this seems to be covered by the sedition offence which we already have. But, at least in English, I do not see how this can be classed as espionage. This is a concern because espionage is generally treated as a very serious matter, whereas publishing a statement might in some circumstances be a fairly minor offence, if for example the publication was seen by very few people.
It used to be said that the British army was always preparing to fight the last war, not the next one. Something rather similar seems to be afflicting our government. The Hong Kong Journalists Association is “not recognised” because of two disagreements in 2019, a play is cancelled because the founder of the drama group tweeted something in 2019, a legislator making reasonable points about tourism and police work is accused of speaking “dangerously” and sounding like some of the things that were said in… 2019.
Now we have national security legislation which appears to be an attempt to criminalise anything and everything people did in 2019 which didn’t please the government. The fear of an encore is unwarranted. The people who wanted the five demands have got the message. They are either going or gone. Relax.
Tags:
Reprint:Friends are welcome to share on the Internet, but please indicate the source of the article when reprinting it.“Stellar Site news portal”。http://turkey.downmusic.org/content-89c599902.html
Related articles
Amir Khan's £11.5m luxury wedding venue finally hosts its first marriage: Bride arrives on horse
travelAmir Khan's £11.5million luxury wedding venue has finally hosted its first marriage after a series o ...
【travel】
Read moreMan, 52, reveals how he fell in love with his 98
travelLove is love.Two men with a 46-year age gap, with the younger in his 50s and the other a nonagenaria ...
【travel】
Read moreSharon Stone shuts down GMB's Ed Balls during awkward moment over 'set
travelSharon Stone shut down GMB's Ed Balls as she accused him of 'setting up a question' during a awkward ...
【travel】
Read more
Popular articles
- Independent UN experts urge Yemen’s Houthis to free detained Baha'i followers
- Compher scores late, Campbell makes 21 saves for 2nd straight shutout as Toronto beats Minnesota 2
- Kansas' governor vetoes a bill for extending child support to fetuses
- Neymar left off Brazil's squad for Copa America. 17
- Socialite Jasmine Hartin enjoys beach snuggle with electrician hunk
- EAEU serves as independent power center in multipolar world, says Putin
Latest articles
Nadal returns to Roland Garros to practice amid doubts over fitness and form
Patrick Corbin gets 1st win of season, Nationals beat Red Sox 5
Cubs place SS Dansby Swanson on the injured list with a sprained right knee as OF Suzuki returns
Framber Valdez pitches 7 strong innings and Astros use a late 4
With Djokovic awaiting the winner, Murray trails Hanfmann at rain
Emotional Mbappé confirms he will leave PSG ahead of an expected move to Real Madrid
LINKS
- A group of Republicans has united to defend the legitimacy of US elections and those who run them
- Narváez outsprints Giro d'Italia favorite Pogačar to win opening stage in Turin
- Kentucky Derby 2024: Eyes on early favorites Fierceness, Sierra Leone
- Arizona is boosting efforts to protect people from the extreme heat after hundreds died last summer
- Afghanistan's only female diplomat resigns in India after gold smuggling allegations
- Burnley slips closer to relegation from Premier League with 4
- Judge denies pretrial release of a man charged with killing a Chicago police officer
- Sadie Sink flashes her bra in a sleek black co
- Tragic Titan sub may have crumbled under 'micro
- ANDREW PIERCE: Don't mention the Tories! How Darlington